NRA Membership Booms by 250,000

From usnews.com: A day before President Barack Obama is scheduled to release Vice President Joe Biden's recommendations to curb gun violence in the United States, the National Rifle Association told U.S. News and World Report that they have seen membership grow by 250,000 in the month since the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut.

"I would say that every time President Obama opens his mouth and Sen. [Dianne] Feinstein opens her mouth and they talk about gun bans and restricting the rights of law abiding Americans, people pay attention to that and sign up," says Andrew Arulanandam, the NRA's public affairs director.

I worked for the NRA for a decade and am a Life Member. Are you a member? We need you now. Click here to join.

 

comment

Comments
Cody's Gravatar I'm one of the 250,000. Joined after Wayne Lapierre gave his first speech after shooting
# Posted By Cody | 1/15/13 4:46 PM
Jason's Gravatar I am avid outdoors man and have served my country but will not give one dime to the NRA. Although i don't say anything to anyone else who does.
# Posted By Jason | 1/15/13 4:56 PM
Paul-NJ's Gravatar I just upped my membership from Life to Endowment Member. We need to do all we can to resist the tyrants.
# Posted By Paul-NJ | 1/15/13 5:55 PM
David in NC's Gravatar I've been torn on supporting the NRA in the past. I feel like a lot of the propaganda the NRA uses is misleading, and they waste millions on repeated mailings to those who are not interested.

HOWEVER, I did recently join the organization because for the first time (since 1994), I believe we are seeing a real, credible threat to our right to bear arms. I just hope all of the "crying wolf" over the years doesn't cause gun owners to ignore this issue. Despite my reservations, I believe now is the time for action. Now is the time when gun owners need to join together in one, united voice. That voice must be the NRA.

There is no other organization with the power and support of the NRA. Sure, we can contact our legislators individually, but we must have someone to collectively speak for the 70-80 million gun owners in this country.
# Posted By David in NC | 1/15/13 6:40 PM
Cary Dion's Gravatar What timing. I just stuck my two year membership in the mail today. I have been a member on and off for years but decided the
time was right to join again. The lib's are starting to say some scary things about us legal, law abiding gun owners. I hope they don't
want to push their luck to far and awaken a sleeping giant.
# Posted By Cary Dion | 1/15/13 7:43 PM
Rodger's Gravatar I was a member of the NRA for years and years. I dropped my membership in 2004 when Bush let the ban on black rifles expire. I simply don't see the need of any member of the public owning one of these guns. I'm not sure why the NRA is against gun registration. I bought a 9mm pistol a couple of weeks ago and the background check took about 15 minutes. Law abiding people like me shouldn't mind such a check. I, personally, don't want felons or mentally deranged people to own weapons of any kind. Why are the gun owners of America so against common sense legislation that might cut down on the violence that occurs daily. I've been called a liberal, a PETA member, and a lot of other nasty things on this very blog. I know that most of the people that contribute and comment are just like me...law abiding folks who like to hunt and shoot. Please use your head before listening to the propaganda spouted by both the NRA and the liberal media. BTW, I also don't think folks should own antiaircraft guns or stinger missles either. Who's with me on that?
# Posted By Rodger | 1/16/13 11:24 AM
BJ's Gravatar NRA Life Member, NRA Certified Rifle and Shotgun Instructor, and NRA Certified Range Safety Officer. Soon to be an NRA Recruiter. I sent my son to NRA's Whittingdon Center as both a camper and then as a counselor. My wife and sons and I are all licensed concealed carry permit holders and carry regularly. I agree that the NRA wastes a lot of money on repetitive mailings but they are the only lobby in Washington looking out for our rights under the 2A. I support them because I've seen the good they do for the shooting and hunting sports. In response to Rodger's comments about owning anti aircraft guns and stinger missiles, the point to remember there is that the public cannot go out and buy those weapons systems at Wal-Mart or Bass Pro Shops. They can go to those retailers and buy firearms for shooting sports, including automatic rifles. If we allow a ban on these type rifles and their higher-capacity magazines, what will this administration or future administrations go after the next time a shooting of this nature occurs? And mark these words - it will happen again no matter how many laws are passed or bans implemented.

The only way to solve the 'gun problem' in their eyes is the eventual ban of all firearms. This NRA member believes that they won't stop until they have achieved that ultimate goal. We cannot give them any ground.
# Posted By BJ | 1/16/13 11:47 AM
blackwolf's Gravatar I am a NRA member and proud of it. I believe that anyone that is a gun owner is burying their heads in the sand if they don't join. The NRA is the most powerful organization standing between the anti gun crowd and us. Rodger stated that he doesn't mind a background check, neither do the rest of us, but I think he is confusing that with the NRA's resistance to a federal log of all gunbuyers. Two totally seperate things. As far as owning an AR, if Rodger doesn't want or use one , does that mean nobody should? Get real! Anyone that has any knowledge of guns and ballistics know that getting shot with a shotgun or deer rifle is going to a lot more damage than an AR bullet. Should we ban all of them? You might, and I emphasize might, be able to get them from law abiding citizens but certainly not the criminals that would use them illegally. Why doesn't the liberal media report the many times that guns in the hands of law abiding gun owners prevent crimes?
# Posted By blackwolf | 1/16/13 12:03 PM
Martin's Gravatar You guys will never stop Obama.
# Posted By Martin | 1/16/13 12:48 PM
Tom's Gravatar Rodger---I agree with you totally. I was a long standing member of the NRA, but gave it up when I felt they were more interested in protecting the gun manufacturers, then representing me the hunter and family man. Many things have to change in this country to make it safer for everyone. Some sensible gun legislation is definetly a part of it. I would like to see a major emphasis on making people accountable for their guns. Everyone should have a gun safe or gun locks on their guns.
# Posted By Tom | 1/16/13 1:11 PM
Rodger's Gravatar Why doesn't the NRA simply change its name to the National Gun Manufactures Lobby Association?
# Posted By Rodger | 1/16/13 2:26 PM
jjas's Gravatar I see both sides of this argument, but nothing that is being proposed would have stopped Sandy Hook from happening. Nothing.

The reality is you can ban ARs and any mag over 10 rounds and it will change absolutely nothing. There are millions of ARs out there now, and tens of millions of high cap mags that will be able to be sold and re-sold over and over again.

It's like trying to close the barn door after the horse is out.

As far as background checks go....I have one done everytime I purchase a firearm @ my lgs. If it is required of private sales, I'll do that too.

But....let's take a look @ private sales. If a person owns a firearm manufactured before the date the legislation goes through, how can that law
be enforced? Tom could sell a gun to Harry and Harry could say it was sold before the law was passed. How would you know it was or wasn't?

It would be another toothless law that puts the burden on law abiding citizens, yet does nothing to stop these killings or illegal gun sales.

I would happily look @ new laws and possibly support them if I felt they would make a real difference.

At this point I've not see one good idea from either side that would make that difference.....nothing. It's just the same old stuff.
# Posted By jjas | 1/16/13 4:17 PM
David in NC's Gravatar Rodger, I can't believe a hunter and gun owner would say they WANT certain guns - the most popular gun in the nation - banned. The gun that many use for all types of sporting purposes from hunting, to target competitions, to self defense. The gun that shoots in the same manner as most handguns, duck shotguns, and many deer hunting rifles.

Supporting a ban on black guns is no different than supporting a ban on semi-auto shotguns, handguns, or bolt action rifles. What will you say when they come for all semi-auto guns? What will you say when they come for the bolt actions and over unders? And when you are desperately trying to protect your single shot T/C, and they decide that too needs to go, then what?

That's about like saying you support deer hunting but want a ban on hunting small game.
# Posted By David in NC | 1/16/13 10:02 PM
David in NC's Gravatar I would. It might not stop the first kid from being shot, but it could stop the next 19.

I went to a pretty rural high school with zero violence, and yet we had an armed SRO officer there full time. And that was almost 20 years ago.
# Posted By David in NC | 1/17/13 12:07 PM
DougInWisconsin's Gravatar Tom, since when is the NRA a hunter's organization? I'm 42 years old and cannot remember the NRA ever being a hunting organization. Rodger, why did you feel the need to buy a 9mm? It's a military weapon. How many rounds does the magazine hold? It's basically a smaller version of the evil black rifles you feel it's okay to ban.

The whole let's ban the black rifle as long as my hunting rifle or shotgun is left alone argument amazes me. And, I'm not a current NRA member or an owner of an AR.
# Posted By DougInWisconsin | 1/17/13 2:39 PM
jjas's Gravatar You can spend millions of dollars putting guards in schools but the reality is, it's a waste of money. The odds of anything happening in YOUR
childs school is astronomical. It might make YOU feel better, but in all honesty it likely would do what it did @ Columbine....nothing.

IMHO, we need to try an figure out what is leading young men to do these things. I read on article that stated many of these young men were
on meds for ADHD or depression. Does that have something to do with it? I don't know, but it seems to be worth looking @.
# Posted By jjas | 1/17/13 6:54 PM