Hanback Blog Classics: Kill or Harvest a Deer?

January marked my 4-year anniversary of blogging, first for Outdoor Life and the last 2 years here on BIG DEER. That means I’ve posted about 1,500 times, maybe more. To blog well, you have to be spontaneous and frequent, on it all the time. This thing is a monster. There are no outlines or deadlines, just post, post, post whenever and wherever you can. I’ve blogged at every hour of the day, in street clothes and camouflage. This is more information than you need, but I’ve bolted upright at 2:00 a.m. and run to my office in my underwear to post about deer. I’ve blogged in hotel rooms and  deer camps, from lodges with wireless to tents and trailers out in the sticks with my Verizon card. When I’m hunting and not blogging, I’m checking BIG DEER and your emails on my Blackberry (might have just got a giant buck somebody killed to get up on the blog!). I have saved every text and picture I have ever posted on one of 5 computers and/or backup drives. Sometimes when I’m rummaging through old files I’ll run across a post I really liked, and that sparked this idea. From time to time I’ll post a classic, like this one from my OL days: 


I just read an article about a guy who “harvested” a nice buck. The next day his buddy went out and “took” a good one.

Please. I killed this 8-pointer dead last fall, and I’m proud of it.

You harvest corn. You kill a deer. You take your kids to school. You shoot a buck. Then there’s the old “bag.” Well, you bag groceries. You kill or shoot game.

We don’t need to tiptoe around the reality that when you shoot something, it dies. Trembling, you walk up to an animal that will never take another breath or step. You’re happy and sad at the same time. You knife open a deer and are shocked by the smell and the hotness of its blood on your hands. To try to rationalize all that away with the benign vernacular is to degrade the experience.

Sometimes I try to spice up my stories by whacking, busting, nailing or smoking a buck. But if you ever catch me harvesting or taking or bagging one, call me on it. That’ll mean I’m old and senile, time to quit.  comment

Comments
I could not agree more, in today's society of being politically correct I find it ironic that when it comes to matters of blunt reality (i.e. killing something) people are not so 'politically correct' and want to handle the situation similar to a 2 month old baby. Keep up the posting Hanback, I enjoy checking in daily to see what is new.
# Posted By Gene R. | 3/9/10 11:52 AM
Right on Mike. I have always considered hunting a matter of life and death. Litterally. The only appropriate time to use harvest, take and bag when talking about hunting is when a "hunter" goes to a game farm and kills an animal that they have picked out on a menu. Thanks for your work on the Blog.
# Posted By Passthru | 3/9/10 11:57 AM
I don't remember this post. Must have been before I found your blog, Mike.

People are waaaay too "pc" these days. Everything is offensive to someone. I agree with you totally. We kill animals. Period. Where I come from, we harvest crops not deer. One thing though, not sure how it is out east but, when someone says they "nailed" something it could mean something else...I'm just sayin'

Thanks for dusting off some of the oldies. I've been here for a while now but I certainly missed some of your early blogs.
# Posted By DougInWisconsin | 3/9/10 12:08 PM
I killed a plate of ribs last night as well. Dead. Done.
# Posted By Dean Weimer | 3/9/10 12:19 PM
100% agree kill deer and all game
harvest corn and soy beans
# Posted By ian in wisconsin | 3/9/10 1:40 PM
That "term" (harvest) is on many of the shows and magazines now.

It's why I don't watch those shows and read those magazines
anymore.......
# Posted By jstreet | 3/9/10 2:19 PM
None of the terms when I hunt down an animal bother me in the least. I have used all of these terms hunting at one time or another, whacking, busting, nailing, smoking, harvesting, taking and bagging and I'm sure a few more that have been missed off the list over the years. I'm sure I have probably upset someone unintentionally by a word or two in my descriptions out there in my excitement. I'm not always trying to be politically correct but just a straight shooter in what I believe in and like. Even if I am using all the correct politically correct terms and words, there will always be someone out there that disagrees with me in our world. There are so many different opinions out there.

My passion is being in the outdoors, hunting, fishing and I'll never get enough time in doing it. I love hunting and my hope is that it will continue to be around for my time here on Earth and for future generations. I'm thankful for this blog and for the other media out there that helps keep my enthusiasm jazzed up for the next hunt or trip planned in my year. Thanks Mike for your hard work putting out this blog and for the others here on the blog.
# Posted By Kevin Root | 3/9/10 2:37 PM
I "killed" a six pack last night!
# Posted By Big daddy | 3/9/10 2:51 PM
This is exactly the same subject as a thread I started on the forum. I loathe the term "harvest" in terms of deer hunting. It only applies to preserves/game farms. And that AIN"T huntin'. I think it's all PC bullsh$t to keep the anti's off our asses. I will never give that term any respect when I feel it has been manufactured by people that would love to take away my guns & rights to use them.
# Posted By Curt | 3/9/10 3:56 PM
For some others' opinions you can check out the thread on the forum @ MIKE HANBACK's Deer Hunting Q&A.
# Posted By Curt | 3/9/10 3:58 PM
Could not have been said better. Another thing I get a lot is when someone says did you catch any deer. I tell them you catch fish not deer.
# Posted By Cheyenne | 3/9/10 4:07 PM
Killing a deer is what it is. You can't sugar coat it like people try to do to everything these days to be politically correct.
# Posted By indiancreekpsychopathic | 3/9/10 4:13 PM
I agree that using "killed" is the proper way to describe the event. But, if someone uses the word "harvest" I wouldn't beat them up over it. HOWEVER, the respect for the animal is MUCH MORE important. I would rather someone say they "harvest" an animal and respect it, then have someone say they "killed" the animal and then go and hang the clothes on it's rack, showing absolute DISRESPECT for that animal.
# Posted By Silverback | 3/9/10 4:22 PM
Right on Mike, I like that old blog.
# Posted By Cody Hunter | 3/9/10 5:09 PM
Bravo Hanback! In this age of PC, it's refreshing to hear someone of your stature take a stand like this!! Deer hunters kill deer, period! We shouldn't have to apologize for that!!
# Posted By Rusty | 3/9/10 6:11 PM
Does the wolf, bear, cougar, coyote, or other predator "harvest", "take", "bag", or "nail" it's kill? Why can't humans still be a predator in modern society? Have we advanced beyond hunting? And, why does it have to be "sport"? Why can't we kill and then eat?

Do the Antis not "kill" their lettuce, tomatoes, carrots, and other vegetables when they eat their salads? Don't all those plants die as well?

I'm tired of having to sugar coat it as well.
# Posted By Dean Weimer | 3/9/10 6:14 PM
I pretty much always say I "killed or shot a deer".

That being said, I wouldn't fault someone for using the term "harvest". I believe this term to have come out of the new era of management where hunters plant food plots, set up trail cameras, and routinely "pass" small bucks. Many of us talk about growing big deer don't we? After planting food plots for the deer, getting hundreds of trail cam pics, and passing on the buck twice before you "shoot" and "kill" the deer, it seems more like we are harvesting the deer. The term does sound quite PC, that's why I don't use it. However, I personally think some of the terms Mike mentioned are more offensive for the opposite reason. Whacked, Nailed, Busted. Many of these terms border on disrespect, like you just hit a melon with a baseball bat just for fun. I kinda cringe when I hear a snaggle-tooth redneck walk up to the check station and say "Man, I whacked 'em and stacked 'em today!".

Shot, Arrowed, Killed. Those are the terms I'm sticking with.
# Posted By David in NC | 3/9/10 7:39 PM
I just don't see the offense in the word "harvest" or the word "kill" in deer hunting. Here is my state the Fish and Game even rides the fence on the word, calling it "Deer Harvest data" and then calling the report a "Deer kill report". Perhaps its safe to say that every state game management agency uses the term harvest because game populations are a renewable resource.

The word "harvest" isn't just a politically correct word and my hope is not to confuse or offend anyone between using the words kill or harvest. Use either word in the way of deer hunting and you are not offending me. The word harvest in the way of usage isn't limited to agricultural crops. Medical people speak of harvesting healthy organs or tissues for the purpose of transplanting. In arid regions, people speak of harvesting water - collecting rainwater for irrigation. We hear people speak of harvesting renewable energy - capturing and storing solar, wind and geothermal energy. Foresters talk about harvesting timber and the need to provide a sustainable yield. We harvest renewable resources. Jesus used the word harvest in John 4:35 when he said "Do you not say, 'Four months more and then the harvest'? I tell you, open your eyes and look at the fields! They are ripe for harvest."
If Jesus can use the word "harvest" to talk about people's souls, if doctors can harvest organs, if foresters can harvest trees, then hunters can talk about the annual harvest of game. I'm for using the word "harvest." Harvest implies something else that's positive to me. Harvest implies thankfulness. I'm thankful for the opportunity and privilege to hunt these awesome animals and to bring in the harvest.

Harvest to me does not say I'm killing a pen raised or farm raised deer on a high fenced property. To me that is a whole separate topic and I am no way using the word harvest to say I support that practice at all. More importantly my hope is that there are more important issues for us hunters to fight over and fight for like preserving our gun rights and preserving our heritage rights to hunt.
# Posted By Kevin Root | 3/9/10 8:22 PM
Harvest, bag,smoked, take, kill....i really can care less what someone wants to call it...just as long as im out there able to do it!
# Posted By Scott from MI | 3/9/10 9:51 PM
You don't ever have to sugarcoat it for me bigboy! I don't offend easily - Kill away!
# Posted By Sully | 3/10/10 1:11 AM
I think I have to agree more with what David in NC said than any of the other comments posted. On the farms wit hthe food plots where there are purposefully growing big, healthy deer, and only shooting certain ones, and I don't just mean high fence places, I think that is harvesting. Seems kind of like a "farmer" working to raise the best "crop" he can all year long and "harvesting" it when the season is right. Around here though, we do kill deer, and we kill a lot of deer every season. I don't like the whacked, busted, or nailed it's people sometimes use. It's usually shot and killed with me although I will tell you that the buck I killed this year with a bow was "drilled" over the phone to my dad and brother.

Cody
# Posted By Cody | 3/10/10 7:56 PM
Depends on who I am talking to which word I choose to use?Other hunters...smoked, killed, shot.....non-hunters harvest
# Posted By parrish | 3/11/10 10:05 AM
I've heard plenty of hard-core deer hunters use various verbs to describe a kill--including harvest.
Doesn't strike me as an issue on which to dwell or for which to denounce our fellow hunters.
# Posted By deerprof | 3/11/10 9:25 PM